Sunday, August 28, 2011

Designed for Black people


In The Mis-Education of the Negro by Carter Godwin Woodson, it states, "If you can control a man's thinking, you don't have to worry about his actions. If you can determine what a man thinks, you do not have to worry about what he will do. If you can make a man believe that he is inferior, you don't have to compel him to seek an inferior status, he will do so without being told and if you can make a man believe that he is justly an outcast, you don't have to order him to the back door, he will go to the back door on his own and if there is no back door, the very nature of the man will demand that you build one."

These words written nearly eighty years ago not only still rings true, but are also the core philosophic foundation behind a modern racist perception management program; of wherein which the perceptions of black people are being covertly negatively shaped as a means of defending and maintaining white dominance and control.

Today the U.S. Government, as with many other white governed nations, now uses media driven perception management programs to defend and maintain their position of white dominance and control. The U.S. media’s racially devaluing depictions and distorted portrayal of its Black population that amplifies the negative to the point that it distorts reality is a deliberate government deplored perception management program. It is purposefully designed to imply the superiority of its whites populous over its Black; therefore creating internalized -self-contemptuous- responses within its Black population that hinders their Black unity, upward mobility and manipulate them to accept white dominance over their lives. It also reinforces seemingly pre-conditioned response of resentment and prejudicial images of Black people in the majority population, thereby creating a false impression of wanton Black criminality and violence. This creates conditioned responses in its population for eventualities to unfold against its targeted Black populous without opposition or resentment.

The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) sums it up: “Perception management through propaganda is the deliberate, systematic attempt to shape perceptions, and direct behavior of a population to achieve responses that furthers the desired intent of the Government.” The DOD further describes "perception management" as a type of psychological operation intended to provoke the behavior you want out of a given individual or targeted group collectively. It is supposed to be directed at foreign audiences, and involves providing or discarding information to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning in a way that is favorable to the originator of the information. The main goal is to influence friends and enemies, provoking them to engage in the behavior that you want.

Perception Management programs uses propaganda as a form of communication to purposefully persuade and/or influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of a community, population, or specified target audiences for ideological, and/or political purposes through the controlled transmission of one-sided messages (which may or may not be factual) via mass and direct media channels. It combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations. Although perception management programs are specifically defined as being limited to foreign audiences, critics of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) charge that it also engages in domestic perception management.

Today what are often deemed as being credible news sources are often totally made up stories made to push a government agenda. This practice of perception management has been used for several decades as a propaganda strategy for controlling how people view political events. Perception management includes all actions used to influence the attitudes and objective reasoning of foreign audiences and consists of Public Diplomacy, Psychological Operations (PSYOPS), Public Information, Deception and Covert Action. It was refined by US intelligence services as they tried to manipulate foreign populations, but it eventually made its way into domestic US politics as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Beginning in the 1950s, more than 800 news and public information organizations and individuals carried out assignments to manage the public's perception of the CIA, according to the New York Times. By the mid-80s, CIA Director William Casey had taken the practice to the next level: an organized, covert "public diplomacy" apparatus designed to sell a governmental objective.

As a means meeting the U.S. Government’s unrelenting objective of maintaining its position of white dominance, the self-perceptions of black people are being covertly negatively shaped. It is done through the “Mainstreaming” of negative propaganda devaluing Black people. It has been an on-going phenomenon for more than 40 years. Its

Through this perception management program Black people are being made to see themselves through mortifyingly lens secretly assigned to them by white elites. This present system uses the national media's proven ability to mass manipulate and socially engineer society through the usage mass media propaganda techniques. Its constant deplorably negative depictions of African Americans- that subjects them to seeing only the fraudulent worst in themselves- is designed to corrupts their sense of racial black unity and cohesion, mold the character of self-hatred, engender self-doubt, self-loathing, and distrust among their group; and insinuate that Blacks admire, respect, and trust only Whites. It also drills the message that Blacks are powerless, of lesser moral, and intelligence and that they need whites to govern over their lives. This “Mainstreaming” of negative propaganda devaluing Black people within the United States has been an on-going phenomenon for more than 40 years. Its unrelenting daily assault on the Black psyche is designed to adversely manipulate and shape the minds and collective consciousness of America’s Black population. The main motto of this mass manipulation program is to divide and conquer and it works by affecting the unconscious mind through deception. This program not only manipulates Blacks to accept white dominance over their lives, it conditions them to prefer it.

There are many quantifying examples supporting the contention that the U.S. government pursues secret agendas which employ mass manipulating perception management programs. Former CIA official Philip Giraldi in his article, “The Rogue Nation,” makes it clear that the U.S. government has a hegemonic agenda that it is pursuing without congressional or public awareness. The agenda’s big picture is not understood by the public or by most in Congress. Giraldi asserts that the agenda is illegal under both U.S. and international law, but that the illegality of the agenda does not serve as a barrier.

In the February issue of the American Behavioral Scientist, a scholarly journal, Professor Lance DeHaven-Smith writes that state crimes against democracy (SCAD) involve government officials, often in combination with private interests that engage in covert activities in order to implement an agenda. Examples include McCarthyism or the fabrication of evidence of communist infiltration, the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution based on false claims of President Johnson and Pentagon chief McNamara that North Vietnam attacked a U.S. naval vessel. During the Cold War, the Pentagon sent undercover US journalists to Russia and Eastern Europe to write pro-American articles for local media outlets. More recently, the US government used perception management techniques to promote the belief that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction in order to justify the invasion of Iraq.

According to the article "The Man Who Sold The War" by James Bamford, a recent edition of Rolling Stone magazine, John Rendon and his Rendon Group, the leader in strategic field of perception management, was awarded 16 million contract from the Pentagon "to target Iraq and other adversaries with propaganda. The Rendon firm has been very influential in creating the conditions necessary to justify the war in Iraq. And it has had close ties with the US government ever since 1991, when the CIA hired the firm to help "create the conditions for the removal of Hussein from power."

Sometimes it involved so-called "white propaganda", stories and op-eds secretly financed by the government. But they also went "black," pushing false story lines, such as how the Sandinistas were actually anti-Semitic drug dealers. That campaign included altered photos and blatant disinformation dispersed by public officials. During the ongoing Iraq war, the US military covertly paid Iraqi newspapers to print stories written by US soldiers; these stories were geared towards enhancing the appearance of the US mission in Iraq.

This massive manipulation/perception management program is at the core of the feeling of self- contempt that many African Americans now experience as well as the feelings of superiority that many whites possess. It adversely manipulates and shapes the minds and collective perceptions of the Black population, breaks down their sense of racial unity and allegiance, molds the character of self-hatred, and engenders self-doubt, self-loathing, and division among their group hence weakening their ranks. It also conditions Black people to accept white dominance over their lives and fosters false justifications for America’s legal system’s mistreatment of African Americans wherein they are disproportionately incarcerated, given stiffer sentences, and unfairly treated.

The effects of this program are also manifested in ideas, education, governmental policies, economic stratification, social segregation, housing markets, hiring and promotion practices, psychological issues, and minority access to a variety of social services and opportunity. It also affects attitudes that, when enacted through governmental policies, laws, and other legislation actions, serve to ensure that African Americans will not advance.[ A study published in the most recent issue of the journal Sociological Inquiry, ScienceDaily (Aug. 23, 2009) —sociologists from four major research institutions supports the hypothesis that large populations can be manipulated in this way.]

History overwhelmingly demonstrates that the White race’s innate proclivity for racism, control, and dominance is much too deeply engrained for them to just merely give up their practices of implementing suppressive methods over its Black population. Therefore this method of defending their white dominance was the logical choice, for unlike the extremely blatant systems used in the past, which Blacks were able to easily identify and therefore unify to form counter strategies against, this racist system is far more sophisticated and much harder to detect. Black reader, once you now know this truth you’ve inherit the moral obligation to spread this truth throughout the masses of our people please do so.

By Franklin Jones

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Sunday, December 27, 2009

(4 of 4) people that's white worked hard on to socially constuct them as savages and monkeys...coincidence?
Damn I'm tired hope I can finish this later
(3 of 4)
undertone of the movie is
that the "monkeys" and
Savages as the program director calls them are in the way. Hey in america, there's a group of
(2 of 4) have respect for the animals, can't save themselves in their own land from the ever powerful white man? Gee that scenario sounds very familiar . The
(1 of 4) Anyway so the "pure" of heart white ex marine has to save these helpless people. People that are supposedly intune with the trees and their ancestors
I'm texting this so I know it looks like crap the blog
(3 of 3) the truth now.
(2 of 3) All this time he knew what humans on the planet were up to. Yet he doesn't warn them till bulldozers come through. Then oh yeah I guess I better tell
(1 of 3) Wouldn't have been so selfish as to use the Na'vi peoples hospitality as a way to boost his shattered ego, escape reality and get some Na'vi poontang.
(6 of 6) with the Na'vi girl for 3 months. His selfish behind was only worried abou


pure of heart that tree seeds land on him. If he was so damn pure he woul

(5 of 6) Navahoe.
OK now what puzzles me is
how this white ex-marine is so pure. He had a lot of time to warn the people of the impending attack. He trained
(4 of 6) first to do so. Oh I also guess the word choice to call the people Na'vi is just coincidence too right. So what if its real close to Namibia and
(3 of 6) body painting, and the spiritual healer are too. Yeah there are other cultures that reflect the same things but its a fact that africans were the
(2 of 6) actress to be Nateeri's voice over. If that just seems coincidental to you then I guess the braids, the cultural connection and respect for nature, the
(1 of 6) Avatar: the movie
This film is a great reflection of white american superiority complex. Think about it, its no mistake that they chose the

Black

Monday, December 14, 2009

Division of African Americans and Black Americans

Some idiot on Youtube wrote me:

AAs & BAs: The KEY difference
between these TWO (2) groups ...

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
The African-Americans (AAs) are an ETHNIC
grouping of people that is comprised ONLY of:

*** The 'Descendants-Of-The-Survivors' of the
chattel-slavery system that took place on
the continental United States of America
during the antebellum era of its history.***


Most (+70%) -- although not all -- of the people
who are born to two (2) AA parents are found to
have an ancestral "racial" lineage that includes
varying amounts of African (45-55%), Amerindian
(+25%) and also European (+20-30%) bloodlines
-- that were both admixed into and "continually
remained" within the lineage of their families.

(Meaning they are of the Mixed-Race category that is
referred to as "Multi-Generational Multiracially-Mixed"
or as 'MGM-Mixed' racially-admixed ancestral lineage)

Thus, this incredibly unique ETHNIC group of people is
actually not seen (by most scientists and geneticist)
as being a 'Black' RACE group (or any sort of RACE
group) at all --- but rather they are seen as actually
being comprised of people that span across
the following "racial" categories and groups ...

**** Multiracial
(about 70% of the AAs -- ex. Jayne Kennedy)

**** Black
(about 20% of the AAs -- ex. Oprah Winfrey)

**** Biracial
(About 5% of the AAs -- ex. Jennifer Beals)

**** Amerindian or White
(About 5% of the AAs -- ex. Walter White)

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
The Black Americans (BAs) are a RACE
grouping of people that consists ONLY of:


***The 'Volitional Immigrants' that are from nations
that are found all over the world and who are both
Fully of the Black Race group and who are also
NOT the descendants-of-the-survivors of the
chattel slavery system that was once found
on the continental United States of America.***

As noted, the BAs are a RACE group and
are seen as being of a fully-Black lineage.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````


Clearly this person is either a multiracial or biracial person with an identity crisis or a racist white person. If I am wrong then you are just a dumbass who ever you are. This person also posted 15 site references that were all blogs and forums. Most of them had names that alluded to my pegging the author as a biracial person like boards.mulatto.org and similar named forums.

Here's my response:

What's in a name really? Thanks for all that information but what are you really trying to say to me?

I am not an African-American, the label is ludicrous to me. White people don't call themselves European Americans. When addressing the term American, I am simply that - American. I am also Black because I relate to the socio-political status in America of dark complected people called Blacks. I dont have a problem calling myself Black American. I have no other culture but American even though my DNA reveals that I descend from Africans currently living in Cameroon and Madagascar. Yet my ancestry also includes Native American and European admixture.

The problem with these forums and blogs labeling is this: How do you define a people who are "Fully of the Black Race group"? If you can give me some DNA proof of a fully Black race with proof of no admixture, I would be surprised. See why below:

Only a person who has no knowledge of DNA would call anyone living today a "pure" or "full" anything. The term in itself is racist, usually coming from those wishing to distance or align themselves with the group in question. The oldest known DNA is from Africans as you probably know. The Mbuti and Khoisan are two of a few indigenous African pygmy tribes that carry genetic remnants of the first groups of modern humans that split off from the oldest DNA more than 100,000 years ago.

You can see color variation in these two groups alone. Look up images for yourself online. You can also see vast differences between these two groups and that each displays the phynotypic facial features attributed to other so-called races, like Asians and Europeans. If these Africans split off from the original Black people, then that means even they are not "pure" or "full" Black Africans even though their DNA can be traced back there. So as far as Africa goes, pureness cannot even be established after at least 60,000 years of migration to and from the African continent. European colonialism has shuffled the mix even more and is also the root cause of all this labeling and division.

Black people span the world and were the first in all continents. Black is by no means confined to Africa. How do we know this, there is archeological evidence that the first civilizations in Europe were of African origin.



We also have evidence that white skin and light eyes occurred fairly recently in relation to the age of modern humans. Modern humans are placed around 180,000 - 82,000 years ago. Yet white features have been found to have genetically mutated 6000 - 10,000 years ago.

http://galsatia.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/blanche_paleur.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDXBv_k6gNY

So in essence aren't white people just really light skinned Blacks.

And therefore, isn't a person mixed with Black and so-called white just the product of a light-skinned Black person and a darker skinned Black person.

It has also been known for a while that Asians descend from Africans just like the rest of the whole entire world. They just didn't want to admit it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJLB1a4EBJo

Many whites actually come from Asian stocks which once again makes no sense to classify them as white when they are clearly a mixed race as well.

http://picasaweb.google.com/choklit75/UntitledAlbum04#5292742568456472114

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tocharians


Most whites originated from Black people who migrated from Africa and went to Melanesia and ended up in Australia.

http://thestudyofracialism.org/about1096.html

http://mathildasdiary.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/blond-egyptians.jpg

Why don't they explore their own origins and stop trying to divide ours. And why dont you stop helping them?

Do the research you will find out the truth.